This just pisses me off. What I fail to understand is... alright, let's say that Timmy is a five year old boy. What's he really being exposed to in a loving homosexual family environment that he's not being exposed to in a loving heterosexual family environment? People scream that it's unnatural, but the thing that gets me is, that comment, more than any other makes no sense. If homosexuality WAS unnatural, why is there a visible percentage of people who seem to have naturally fallen into it? It's not limited to class, race, sex or religion. A black protestant man is as likely to be as gay as a white jewish girl. There's no definative correlation. But it's "unnatural". No. You're just an idiot.
no subject
What I fail to understand is... alright, let's say that Timmy is a five year old boy. What's he really being exposed to in a loving homosexual family environment that he's not being exposed to in a loving heterosexual family environment?
People scream that it's unnatural, but the thing that gets me is, that comment, more than any other makes no sense.
If homosexuality WAS unnatural, why is there a visible percentage of people who seem to have naturally fallen into it? It's not limited to class, race, sex or religion. A black protestant man is as likely to be as gay as a white jewish girl. There's no definative correlation.
But it's "unnatural".
No. You're just an idiot.