Today's rant of the day!
May. 18th, 2004 03:02 pmWith appropriate rant-like user icon!
This one stems from a point I was trying to make today on
music_geeks about the apparent homogenous of music.
My beef is with that.. but with something much nastier.
I've been thinking in terms of the evolution of a band.
There's a joke out there about Enya.. want to know what her new album will sounds like? Listen to the old one backwards.. and as far as I can tell.. this is true. Enya has never changed her sound, never evolved.. has remained constant and, frankly, boring.
On the other hand, take a band like The Beatles who were constantly trying new things, pushing the limits, seeing what they could do... and making it work! Each new album was exciting. What would they do now?
I can sit here and think of some bands who have clearly changed and matured.
An example of that is the numerous changes in sound I've heard from my favorite bands, They Might Be Giants... going from two men and a number of gadgets (Original Album) to two men and a full backup band (John Henry) to two men, a full backup band, computerization and assistance from numerous musical sources (Mink Car).
And then there are bands like Barenaked Ladies.
Despite the fact that I DO like Barenaked Ladies and they remain one of my favorite bands.. their sound hasn't changed since they hired Kevin Hearney. They sound exactly the same in "Everything to Everyone" as they did in "Stunt". Not as bad as Enya.. different hooks, different melodies, but the same SOUND.
WHY? Why have you, as a band, not been able to mature? Do you feel comfortable doing the same thing continuously? Do you realize that this gets boring and stale fast?
I mean, seriously.. how do you expect you will remain popular if you don't change with the times? Your sound will get old. You'll be dating yourself. You'll be "so early 2000s".
So.. yeah.
Not much else to say. I feel... off today. I can't really explain why.. but it will be good to get home, I think and relax and hope I'm better tommorow.
This one stems from a point I was trying to make today on
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
My beef is with that.. but with something much nastier.
I've been thinking in terms of the evolution of a band.
There's a joke out there about Enya.. want to know what her new album will sounds like? Listen to the old one backwards.. and as far as I can tell.. this is true. Enya has never changed her sound, never evolved.. has remained constant and, frankly, boring.
On the other hand, take a band like The Beatles who were constantly trying new things, pushing the limits, seeing what they could do... and making it work! Each new album was exciting. What would they do now?
I can sit here and think of some bands who have clearly changed and matured.
An example of that is the numerous changes in sound I've heard from my favorite bands, They Might Be Giants... going from two men and a number of gadgets (Original Album) to two men and a full backup band (John Henry) to two men, a full backup band, computerization and assistance from numerous musical sources (Mink Car).
And then there are bands like Barenaked Ladies.
Despite the fact that I DO like Barenaked Ladies and they remain one of my favorite bands.. their sound hasn't changed since they hired Kevin Hearney. They sound exactly the same in "Everything to Everyone" as they did in "Stunt". Not as bad as Enya.. different hooks, different melodies, but the same SOUND.
WHY? Why have you, as a band, not been able to mature? Do you feel comfortable doing the same thing continuously? Do you realize that this gets boring and stale fast?
I mean, seriously.. how do you expect you will remain popular if you don't change with the times? Your sound will get old. You'll be dating yourself. You'll be "so early 2000s".
So.. yeah.
Not much else to say. I feel... off today. I can't really explain why.. but it will be good to get home, I think and relax and hope I'm better tommorow.