An interesting article
Nov. 21st, 2003 10:53 aman interesting article
I have to agree with the school. They did the right thing. The girl was wrong.
It is unacceptable to see a guy and girl making out publicly (in a cafeteria or anyplace publicly in the school).
So how is it any more acceptable for two girls to do so? Because she was making a social statement? Bullshit!
Her point is valid. I would suggest another way to show it, though.
I do think the school needs to have a discussion with said English Teacher though. I'm sure he meant well, but.. well.. noncomformist acts can backfire simply because they ARE noncomformist. Here's a good example of how.
I have to agree with the school. They did the right thing. The girl was wrong.
It is unacceptable to see a guy and girl making out publicly (in a cafeteria or anyplace publicly in the school).
So how is it any more acceptable for two girls to do so? Because she was making a social statement? Bullshit!
Her point is valid. I would suggest another way to show it, though.
I do think the school needs to have a discussion with said English Teacher though. I'm sure he meant well, but.. well.. noncomformist acts can backfire simply because they ARE noncomformist. Here's a good example of how.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-21 08:15 am (UTC)No, I have to disagree there. Due to the flood of hormones, it was definitely not that irregular an occurrence to see two people making out in my high school. Upon occasion, those two individuals weren't necessarily of opposite sexes, even.
Here's my take on it:
It was kind of a "don't look if you don't wanna see" policy. I think that's pretty much what made this act controversial: that she made such a big deal about it. If she was just kissing her girlfriend, as opposed to "giving tongue for a good cause", it'd be fine, in my book. Well, standing on a table was probably bad too, who wants to eat on that?
Point is, she's just a teenager who made just a bit TOO much of a statement. Doh. It happens. We learn to adjust to society when we're young... and I guess, in that case, I don't see much wrong with her being suspended, she'll learn how to make a more subtle but potent statement in the future. Maybe she'll become a lesbian out of spite.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-21 10:13 am (UTC)When they start having sex in the hallways... that's another issue. (And yes, that happened in my high school)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-21 11:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-21 11:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-21 11:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-21 04:06 pm (UTC)I highly doubt that a straight girl would "make out" with another straight girl to prove a point.
Did you READ the article? The girl said flat-out she was making a statement. She yelled "END HOMOPHOBIA NOW!"
Haaser said she was making a statement on behalf of gay and lesbian students because she was bothered by the verbal and physical harassment they face.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-21 08:22 pm (UTC)It would mean more if they were actually lesbian and had no issue showing it in public rather than doing so simply to make a point. It would be about as ridiculous as having public sexual activity with another person of same gender - it's just as patently unacceptable regardless of whether it was meant to be enjoyed or meant to make a statement.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-11-21 10:49 pm (UTC)