hkellick: (FlameStone)
The squirm is at the emergency room right now. He's been spitting up bright red blood with his milk and we don't know why. Unfortunately, I have to go to work. One of my cases has gone nuclear and I need to be there to help my boss be ready for a huge phone call Monday. But I'm half-preparing to have to rush back home.

The Oil Spill..
Looks like they're currently predicting that it might hit South Florida within the next couple weeks and could make it's way up the Eastern Seaboard.

There's been alot of talk about Exxon Valdez, how this thing could be worse than Exxon Valdez, which is bad because we look back at Alaska right now and the Oil Spill STILL hasn't been cleaned up. 18 days later.

I feel a rant about deregulation coming on, but not today. I *AM* concerned about the Oil Slick coming up the Atlantic Coastline. That would be Bad with a capital B. And of course, our idiotic governor wants to push Offshore Drilling RIGHT NOW. Not that I don't understand the argument behind offshire drilling, but right now feels like the wrong time to push it.

Anyways.. will keep people in the loop, re: Squirmy.

EDIT 1: Robert is being admitted. We aren't sure where. They're trying to put an IV in him now (and he doesn't want to) and they're telling K no food, for the moment. It's all I've got.

See this? This is my angry, frustrated "What the hell is it going to take until my boy is OK" face.

Still gotta stay at work as long as I can...

EDIT 2: K is a wreck. Boy has a heplock in and a line, but no IV fluids yet. Meanwhile, he's hungry and the GI doctor says nothing by mouth. He's been admitted for at least a day, but it will likely be more as they clear his system out and get a chance to scope him.

EDIT 3: GI Specialist saw Robert. They're thinking that K's breastmilk may not be safe still. They're saying we'll probably have to formula-feed him for.. a while longer. Apparently, he's getting some soon. If he still spits up blood while on the formula, then... we have a problem and the boy gets scoped. So... hopefully, I guess. The formula DOES seem like it works.
hkellick: (Lakes)
I have never been a fan of Offshore Drilling. I understand the argument that most of the Oil coming into the states is controlled by government that aren't friendly to us, but I think the proper response is to try to find (or grow) oil alternatives, not risk sullying American Waters with oil slicks. There's been some interesting research showing that we can make a pretty good biodiesel out of algae.. I think America's true future lies in oil alternatives, not continuing to idly consume oil until it's all gone and we have no real alternatives.

I did not agree with President Obama when he agreed to offshore oil drilling. I DOUBLY so disagree now, in the wake of what could be the biggest ecological disaster in a long, long time.

It was incredibly ironic that it started so close to Earth Day.

Now it looks like the leak is so bad that they can't even get it FIXED for three months. That means LOTS of Oil will be leaking into the Gulf Canal for MONTHS. How much oil? More, likely, than spilled by the Exxon Valdez.

I am quite disturbed by this.

I'm glad I don't live off any of those Gulf States. It's going to be hell for them. As I understand it, this isn't just an ecosystem problem, but a human problem too. Besides the loss of local wildlife and the likelihood that the Gulf is not going to be a good place to boat, swim, fish or spend any time at all indeed (I picture it now, the Gulf Cruise, from New Orleans to Florida. Come, see the oil-covered crawdads, and Galveston Bay is so gorgeous when it burns in the evening.), but the fact that the human systems exiting the Gulf Coast (like.. oh.. water treatment plants) aren't really designed to handle too much oil. Most Water Treatment plants rid the water of contaminants by allowing them to settle, but oil won't settle. So... if you live off the Gulf Coast, I'd go buy some bottled water, were I you.

Actually, come to think of it.. there's the little issue of the Gulf Stream. All that oil will likely move with the water.. that should complicate things somewhat.

Oh, and then there's the little issue of Hurricane season. Storm Surge + Oil = Massive Nastiness.

In short... President Obama, you are going to be under a lot of fire in the months to come as we all see just how ugly this is going to get about your decision to allow Offshore Drilling. I highly suggest you reconsider.
hkellick: It's a River. Which River? Dunno (River)
So props need to go out to Speaker Pelosi for pushing the Carbon Cap and Trade bill through the House this last Friday. Apparently getting the congressmen to sign off on it was very like herding cats. Some wouldn't sign it because it was too stringent and would hurt their constituents. Others wouldn't sign it because it wasn't stringent enough. Regardless, Pelosi handed Obama a victory.

I find all the screaming about how TERRIBLE Cap and Trade is to be.. well, somewhat laughable honestly.

The idiots that scream about how terrible it is, how it'll ruin businesses really need to read up on their history, because we've already instituted cap and trade in the past and it's worked.

Once, not so very long ago, the great lakes were a mess. Especially Lake Erie, the shallowest of the five. So bad was Lake Erie that it got special mention in Dr. Seuss's "The Lorax" (now long gone, but it was there.) Lake Erie was so bad that little no oxygen was found inside the lake itself.

Scientists went to go determine the cause and they found that the answer, much like Global Warming, was due to Human Pollution. Specifically, it was due to the dumping of phosphorus and nitrogen into the great lakes.

In short, the reasons for this were... nitrogen and phosphorus are chemicals that living systems need to grow. Algal blooms, upon access to the added nitrogen and phosphorus, would grow.. and grow and grow and grow. Then they'd die and they'd sink to the bottom. And on the bottom of the sea they'd be eaten by bacteria that used oxygen in the lake to digest the algae. Which would remove the oxygen from the lake, leading to an anoxic environment.

Remove the added nutrients and you control the algal blooms.

The Clean Water Act passed in 1972 which demanded that we clean up these bodies of water. Places like Lake Erie and the Potomac River and so on on and so forth. And, like now, the EPA was trying to determine the fairest/most acceptable way to dole out the oncoming changes.

Enter the term TMDL, Total Maximum Daily Load.. the concept that a body of water can handle a certain amount of a pollutant and stay within the healthy range. For example, and I'm making number up here.. let's say Lake Erie can accept 25 megatons of phosphorus a day and not develop so many algal blooms that the lake becomes anoxic. Let's now assume that 5 of those megatons is added to the lake via nonpoint sources, mostly agriculture. That means that we can allow 20 megatons of phosphorus a day to be added into the lake from controllable point sources: factories, wastewater treatment plants, etc.

Enter cap and trade. Don't know if it was called that, but it's the same policy. We have 20,000 permits that allow you to put in 1,000 tons of phosphorus into the lake a day. You can buy and sell them to each other as you like, but no more than 25 megatons of phosphorus can enter the lake in one day.

And the system worked. There was whining. There was complaining, but the system WORKED, still works now. And the Lakes are so much better for it.

What we institute here in America won't necessarily have the same huge changes as what happened in the 70s along the Great Lakes since we're one of many polluters and the globe is a much bigger system than five interconncted lakes, but the point is.. the policy is sound and has worked in the past.

April 2024

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags