HitchHiker's
May. 5th, 2005 07:17 amSo.. I did see Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy last night.
I was... disappointed.
It was a good science fiction comedy. There were alot of amusing points and I enjoyed.
But there was a whole lot of the movie that, as far as I remember, is never in any of the books I've read.
And the whole love story aspect... no! NO NO NO NO NO! What about Fenchurch, eh?
Though some Fenchurch and Trillian pr0n would be totally hawt.
Anyways...
The personalities were, by and large, pretty spot on. Except for Trillian and Arthur and they were trying to force the whole love thing there.
I really did enjoy it. It's a decent movie. Just.. if you haven't read the book recently... wait until after the movie.
And, of course, the book is better :)
I was... disappointed.
It was a good science fiction comedy. There were alot of amusing points and I enjoyed.
But there was a whole lot of the movie that, as far as I remember, is never in any of the books I've read.
And the whole love story aspect... no! NO NO NO NO NO! What about Fenchurch, eh?
Though some Fenchurch and Trillian pr0n would be totally hawt.
Anyways...
The personalities were, by and large, pretty spot on. Except for Trillian and Arthur and they were trying to force the whole love thing there.
I really did enjoy it. It's a decent movie. Just.. if you haven't read the book recently... wait until after the movie.
And, of course, the book is better :)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-05 12:10 pm (UTC)Quite aside from the fact that most people (including you until you saw it) are trying to *AVOID* any kind of spoiler... *grumble*
Fenchurch isn't there until book four in the dead-tree format, and there was certainly a unidirectional interest in the Arthur-Trillian thing, just not reciprocated.
I'm prepared to accept that angle, though - Hollywood is never happy with a movie unless there's a love-interest theme, so we sort of have to deal with it.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-05 12:13 pm (UTC)It just.. bothered me.
And, yeah, Arthur may have been interested, but... it wasn't a central theme.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-05 01:55 pm (UTC)Re: not a central theme - I definitely agree there. Until I've seen the movie myself, I'm going to reserve judgement on an Arthur/Trillian love angle, but I'm prepared to accept one if it doesn't damage the more general plot too much.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-05 12:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-05 12:59 pm (UTC)Fun with lynx ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-05 09:28 pm (UTC)I think they did well to adapt it for a movie. I enjoyed stephan fry narratoring.